On Wednesday, March 6th, 2024, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) issued official climate rules mandating public companies to disclose specific climate-related risks, marking a historic regulatory move after two years of intense debate.
This regulation, which garnered approximately 16,000 comments from various stakeholders including companies, trade groups, investors, and climate activists, represents a significant step towards enhancing transparency in corporate climate reporting.
However, considerable revisions were made from the SEC's original proposal, most notably the exclusion of requirements for reporting Scope 3 emissions – emissions generated by business value chains. This alteration was reportedly made to address concerns about potential legal challenges. Nonetheless, climate advocates express disappointment over the omission, emphasizing the crucial role of Scope 3 emissions reporting in providing a comprehensive view of a company's environmental impact.
SEC's climate legislation dates back to March 2022 when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission initially proposed rule changes mandating companies to disclose specific climate-related information. These proposals aimed to cover aspects ranging from greenhouse gas emissions to anticipated climate related risks and transition plans, drawing inspiration from frameworks such as the TCFD. Despite the initial proposal, the SEC has faced delays in finalizing the rules, leading to uncertainty among stakeholders.
The SEC rules will mandate publicly listed companies to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions, emphasizing reporting for recent and historical fiscal years. While following GHG Protocol standards, the rules grant flexibility in calculation methods, though companies must provide details on methodology and significant inputs.
Companies must disclose 'material' direct emissions (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased electricity, steam or cooling (Scope 2), with data reported in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). This requires aggregating and disaggregating emissions by gas type and calculating emissions from all organizational sources, excluding offsets.
'Material' emissions refer to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that are considered significant or substantial in terms of their environmental impact, as well as their influence on climate change. These emissions are typically those that contribute the most to a company's overall carbon footprint or have a significant effect on the environment due to their volume or intensity.
According to the latest update, Scope 3 emissions disclosure is not being made mandatory. However, larger companies are encouraged to include Scope 3 in their disclosures if reduction targets include them. Scope 3 encompasses indirect emissions throughout a company's value chain, necessitating separate disclosure and identification of significant emission categories.
Under the SEC climate disclosure rules, companies will be required to disclose information regarding their assessment of climate related risks, i.e. naturally occurring events which may have impacts on business operations, such as floods, droughts or wildfires. This includes having the relevant risk management processes in place, detailing the board's role in overseeing such risks and management's efforts in assessing and mitigating them.
While the rules do not mandate having a board expert, companies must disclose the relevant board members or committees responsible for overseeing climate-related risks, along with any board members possessing expertise in this area. This requirement parallels existing rules mandating disclosure of audit committee financial experts, emphasizing the SEC's push for greater transparency and accountability regarding climate risks, and financial reporting.
SEC's Chair Gary Gensler stated: “Today, investors representing literally tens of trillions of dollars support climate-related disclosures because they recognize that climate risks can pose significant financial risks to companies, and investors need reliable information about climate risks to make informed investment decisions.”
Materiality assessments will be required to determine whether disclosures outside of the financial statements are required—such as climate-related risks. Typically, material impacts are considered in the context of a company’s current financial condition and may or may not explicitly consider future periods, especially periods that extend as far in the future as many potential climate-related impacts. Given the uncertainty around many climate developments, in some cases, this evaluation may be challenging. To get more information on materiality assessments, see our dedicated blog post here.
Large 'accelerated' businesses (which generate $700m or more) will have to disclose 'material' scope 1 and 2 emissions with compliance deadlines phased in over several years.
Navigating with SEC’s disclosures requires a strategic approach. Here's a step-by-step guide on how companies can effectively prepare for climate related disclosures:
As the SEC disclosures have now been given the stamp of approval, it's crucial for businesses to be fully prepared. Revisit your current position to ensure understanding of key frameworks like CDP, CDSB, SASB, and SBTi, and reassess reporting strategies for clarity and accuracy. Envision the ideal future state of climate resiliency for your company and map out the necessary steps to fulfil disclosure requirements for annual reports.
Achieve full SEC compliance with Sweep. We can help you to:
Find out more today.
Sweep helps you get your carbon on-track
Sign up to The Cleanup, our monthly climate newsletter
© Sweep 2024